↓ Skip to main content

Genes Influence Young Children’s Human Figure Drawings and Their Association With Intelligence a Decade Later

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
twitter
233 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genes Influence Young Children’s Human Figure Drawings and Their Association With Intelligence a Decade Later
Published in
Psychological Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1177/0956797614540686
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalind Arden, Maciej Trzaskowski, Victoria Garfield, Robert Plomin

Abstract

Drawing is ancient; it is the only childhood cognitive behavior for which there is any direct evidence from the Upper Paleolithic. Do genes influence individual differences in this species-typical behavior, and is drawing related to intelligence (g) in modern children? We report on the first genetically informative study of children's figure drawing. In a study of 7,752 pairs of twins, we found that genetic differences exert a greater influence on children's figure drawing at age 4 than do between-family environmental differences. Figure drawing was as heritable as g at age 4 (heritability of .29 for both). Drawing scores at age 4 correlated significantly with g at age 4 (r = .33, p < .001, n = 14,050) and with g at age 14 (r = .20, p < .001, n = 4,622). The genetic correlation between drawing at age 4 and g at age 14 was .52, 95% confidence interval = [.31, .75]. Individual differences in this widespread behavior have an important genetic component and a significant genetic link with g.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 233 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
New Zealand 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 115 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 33 27%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 346. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#95,967
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#240
of 4,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#743
of 247,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#8
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.