↓ Skip to main content

The effect of social health insurance on prenatal care: the case of Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Economics and Management, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
The effect of social health insurance on prenatal care: the case of Ghana
Published in
International Journal of Health Economics and Management, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10754-014-9155-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen O. Abrokwah, Christine M. Moser, Edward C. Norton

Abstract

Many developing countries have introduced social health insurance programs to help address two of the United Nations' millennium development goals-reducing infant mortality and improving maternal health outcomes. By making modern health care more accessible and affordable, policymakers hope that more women will seek prenatal care and thereby improve health outcomes. This paper studies how Ghana's social health insurance program affects prenatal care use and out-of-pocket expenditures, using the two-part model to model prenatal care expenditures. We test whether Ghana's social health insurance improved prenatal care use, reduced out-of-pocket expenditures, and increased the number of prenatal care visits. District-level differences in the timing of implementation provide exogenous variation in access to health insurance, and therefore strong identification. Those with access to social health insurance have a higher probability of receiving care, a higher number of prenatal care visits, and lower out-of-pocket expenditures conditional on spending on care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 22%
Social Sciences 22 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#207
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,854
of 247,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.