↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Time in Therapeutic Range in Four European Countries

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Therapeutics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Time in Therapeutic Range in Four European Countries
Published in
Clinical Therapeutics, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.07.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

François-Emery Cotté, Hicham Benhaddi, Isabelle Duprat-Lomon, Adam Doble, Nick Marchant, Alexia Letierce, Michael Huguet

Abstract

Patients with atrial fibrillation are at increased risk for stroke and thus require anticoagulant prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists. However, many such patients fail to achieve target coagulation status. The objective of this study was to evaluate time in the therapeutic range and its relationship to clinical outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation prescribed a vitamin K antagonist in everyday clinical practice in 4 European countries (France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 36 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Therapeutics
#1,106
of 3,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,498
of 247,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Therapeutics
#12
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.