↓ Skip to main content

The Importance of Proximity to Death in Modelling Community Medication Expenditures for Older People: Evidence From New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
The Importance of Proximity to Death in Modelling Community Medication Expenditures for Older People: Evidence From New Zealand
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40258-014-0121-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick V. Moore, Kathleen Bennett, Charles Normand

Abstract

Concerns about the long-term sustainability of health care expenditures (HCEs), particularly prescribing expenditures, has become an important policy issue in most developed countries. Previous studies suggest that proximity to death (PTD) has a significant effect on total HCEs, with its exclusion leading to an overestimation of likely growth. There are limited studies of pharmaceutical expenditures in which PTD is taken into account.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 6 13%
Lecturer 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 21%
Social Sciences 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,681,865
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#162
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,821
of 235,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.