↓ Skip to main content

Matrix metalloproteinases in tumorigenesis: an evolving paradigm

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Matrix metalloproteinases in tumorigenesis: an evolving paradigm
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00018-011-0763-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Hua, Minjing Li, Ting Luo, Yancun Yin, Yangfu Jiang

Abstract

Proteases are crucial for development, tissue remodeling, and tumorigenesis. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) family, in particular, consists of more than 20 members with unique substrates and diverse function. The expression and activity of MMPs in a variety of human cancers have been intensively studied. MMPs have well-recognized roles in the late stage of tumor progression, invasion, and metastasis. However, increasing evidence demonstrates that MMPs are involved earlier in tumorigenesis, e.g., in malignant transformation, angiogenesis, and tumor growth both at the primary and metastatic sites. Recent studies also suggest that MMPs play complex roles in tumor progression. While most MMPs promote tumor progression, some of them may protect the host against tumorigenesis in a context-dependent manner. MMPs have been chosen as promising targets for cancer therapy on the basis of their aberrant up-regulation in malignant tumors and their ability to promote cancer metastasis. Although preclinical studies testing the efficacy of MMP suppression in tumor models were so encouraging, the results of clinical trials in cancer patients have been rather disappointing. Here, we review the complex roles of MMPs and their endogenous inhibitors such as tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase in tumorigenesis and strategies in suppressing MMPs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Chemistry 11 8%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,215,768
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#531
of 6,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,768
of 132,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.