| Title |
Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Is Now EVAR the First Choice of Treatment?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-013-0782-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rita Fossaceca, Giuseppe Guzzardi, Paolo Cerini, Emanuele Malatesta, Ignazio Divenuto, Alessandro Stecco, Giuseppe Parziale, Piero Brustia, Alessandro Carriero |
| Abstract |
This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of endovascular treatment (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 58% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2014.
All research outputs
#12,841,494
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1,062
of 2,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,421
of 211,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.