You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Going Coastal: Shared Evolutionary History between Coastal British Columbia and Southeast Alaska Wolves (Canis lupus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0019582 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Byron V. Weckworth, Natalie G. Dawson, Sandra L. Talbot, Melanie J. Flamme, Joseph A. Cook |
| Abstract |
Many coastal species occupying the temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest in North America comprise endemic populations genetically and ecologically distinct from interior continental conspecifics. Morphological variation previously identified among wolf populations resulted in recognition of multiple subspecies of wolves in the Pacific Northwest. Recently, separate genetic studies have identified diverged populations of wolves in coastal British Columbia and coastal Southeast Alaska, providing support for hypotheses of distinct coastal subspecies. These two regions are geographically and ecologically contiguous, however, there is no comprehensive analysis across all wolf populations in this coastal rainforest. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 155 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,777,244
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#35,969
of 193,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,388
of 110,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#335
of 1,562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.