↓ Skip to main content

Requirement for CDK4 kinase function in breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
patent
29 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
353 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Requirement for CDK4 kinase function in breast cancer
Published in
Cancer Cell, January 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.12.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qunyan Yu, Ewa Sicinska, Yan Geng, Marie Ahnström, Agnieszka Zagozdzon, Yinxin Kong, Humphrey Gardner, Hiroaki Kiyokawa, Lyndsay N. Harris, Olle Stål, Piotr Sicinski

Abstract

Cyclin D1 is overexpressed in the majority of human breast cancers. We previously found that mice lacking cyclin D1 are resistant to mammary carcinomas triggered by the ErbB-2 oncogene. In this study, we investigated which function of cyclin D1 is required for ErbB-2-driven mammary oncogenesis. We report that the ability of cyclin D1 to activate cyclin-dependent kinase CDK4 underlies the critical role for cyclin D1 in breast cancer formation. We also found that the continued presence of CDK4-associated kinase activity is required to maintain breast tumorigenesis. We analyzed primary human breast cancers and found high cyclin D1 levels in a subset (approximately 25%) of ErbB-2-overexpressing tumors. We propose that this subset of breast cancer patients might benefit from inhibiting CDK4 kinase.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
China 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 191 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 18%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 19%
Chemistry 7 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 58 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,617,063
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell
#1,112
of 3,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,125
of 174,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.