| Title |
Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Critical Analysis of the ELIOT and TARGIT Trials. Part 2—TARGIT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3999-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melvin J. Silverstein, Gerd Fastner, Sergio Maluta, Roland Reitsamer, Donald A. Goer, Frank Vicini, David Wazer |
| Abstract |
Two randomized intraoperative radiation therapy trials for early-stage breast cancer were recently published. The ELIOT Trial used electrons (IOERT), and the TARGIT-A Trial Update used 50-kV X-rays (IORT). These studies were compared for similarities and differences. The results were analyzed and used to determine which patients might be suitable for single-dose treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,959,637
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#416
of 6,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,912
of 237,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.