↓ Skip to main content

From uni- to multimodality: towards an integrative view on anuran communication

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
From uni- to multimodality: towards an integrative view on anuran communication
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00359-014-0923-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris Starnberger, Doris Preininger, Walter Hödl

Abstract

Undeniably, acoustic signals are the predominant mode of communication in frogs and toads. Acoustically active species are found throughout the vast diversity of anuran families. However, additional or alternative signal modalities have gained increasing attention. In several anurans, seismic, visual and chemical communications have convergently evolved due to ecological constraints such as noisy environments. The production of a visual cue, like the inevitably moving vocal sac of acoustically advertising males, is emphasized by conspicuously coloured throats. Limb movements accompanied by dynamic displays of bright colours are additional examples of striking visual signals independent of vocalizations. In some multimodal anuran communication systems, the acoustic component acts as an alert signal, which alters the receiver attention to the following visual display. Recent findings of colourful glands on vocal sacs, producing volatile species-specific scent bouquets suggest the possibility of integration of acoustic, visual and chemical cues in species recognition and mate choice. The combination of signal components facilitates a broadened display repertoire in challenging environmental conditions. Thus, the complexity of the communication systems of frogs and toads may have been underestimated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Argentina 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 128 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 60%
Environmental Science 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1,225
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,311
of 228,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.