| Title |
Screening Methodologies for the Development of Spray-Dried Amorphous Solid Dispersions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-014-1457-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Íris Duarte, José Luís Santos, João F. Pinto, Márcio Temtem |
| Abstract |
To present a new screening methodology intended to be used in the early development of spray-dried amorphous solid dispersions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 31 | 31% |
| Chemical Engineering | 11 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,927
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#2,473
of 2,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,917
of 235,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.