You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Academic medicine, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181b6ba00 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carol Isaac, Barbara Lee, Molly Carnes |
Abstract |
To systematically review experimental evidence for interventions mitigating gender bias in employment. Unconscious endorsement of gender stereotypes can undermine academic medicine's commitment to gender equity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 30% |
Norway | 4 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
Hong Kong | 2 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 67% |
Scientists | 9 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 290 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 46 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 14% |
Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
Researcher | 39 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
Other | 56 | 18% |
Unknown | 56 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 69 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 41 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 30 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 5% |
Other | 53 | 17% |
Unknown | 67 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2023.
All research outputs
#200,381
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#44
of 6,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#433
of 108,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.