↓ Skip to main content

Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Academic medicine, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 6,833)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
44 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review
Published in
Academic medicine, October 2009
DOI 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181b6ba00
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Isaac, Barbara Lee, Molly Carnes

Abstract

To systematically review experimental evidence for interventions mitigating gender bias in employment. Unconscious endorsement of gender stereotypes can undermine academic medicine's commitment to gender equity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 289 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 14%
Student > Master 41 14%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 56 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 23%
Social Sciences 41 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 31 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 67 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2023.
All research outputs
#197,582
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#43
of 6,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#428
of 107,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.