↓ Skip to main content

Health Information-Seeking on Behalf of Others: Characteristics of “Surrogate Seekers”

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Education, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Health Information-Seeking on Behalf of Others: Characteristics of “Surrogate Seekers”
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13187-014-0701-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah L. Cutrona, Kathleen M. Mazor, Sana N. Vieux, Tana M. Luger, Julie E. Volkman, Lila J. Finney Rutten

Abstract

Understanding the behaviors of surrogate seekers (those who seek health information for others) may guide efforts to improve health information transmission. We used 2011-2012 data from the Health Information National Trends Survey to describe behaviors of online surrogate seekers. Respondents were asked about use of the Internet for surrogate-seeking over the prior 12 months. Data were weighted to calculate population estimates. Two thirds (66.6 %) reported surrogate-seeking. Compared to those who sought health information online for only themselves, surrogate seekers were more likely to live in households with others (weighted percent 89.4 vs. 82.5 % of self-seekers; p < 0.05); no significant differences in sex, race, income or education were observed. Surrogate seekers were more likely to report activities requiring user-generated content: email communication with healthcare providers; visits to social networking sites to read and share about medical topics and participation in online health support groups. On multivariate analysis, those who had looked online for healthcare providers were more likely to be surrogate seekers (OR 1.67, 95 % CI 1.08-2.59). In addition to seeking health information, surrogate seekers create and pass along communications that may influence medical care decisions. Research is needed to identify ways to facilitate transmission of accurate health information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Master 15 13%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 42 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,669,803
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#164
of 1,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,094
of 228,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.