↓ Skip to main content

q-Rotations and Krawtchouk polynomials

Overview of attention for article published in The Ramanujan Journal, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
q-Rotations and Krawtchouk polynomials
Published in
The Ramanujan Journal, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11139-015-9681-0
Authors

Vincent X. Genest, Sarah Post, Luc Vinet, Guo-Fu Yu, Alexei Zhedanov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 33%
Physics and Astronomy 2 33%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,725,418
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from The Ramanujan Journal
#85
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,517
of 285,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Ramanujan Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them