Title |
Systematic review of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form
|
---|---|
Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00520-014-2389-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kristine A. Donovan, Kevin D. Stein, Morgan Lee, Corinne R. Leach, Onaedo Ilozumba, Paul B. Jacobsen |
Abstract |
Fatigue is a subjective complaint that is believed to be multifactorial in its etiology and multidimensional in its expression. Fatigue may be experienced by individuals in different dimensions as physical, mental, and emotional tiredness. The purposes of this study were to review and characterize the use of the 30-item Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) in published studies and to evaluate the available evidence for its psychometric properties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 20% |
Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 17% |
Psychology | 11 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 36 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,927
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,567
of 4,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,990
of 235,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#63
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.