↓ Skip to main content

BET_VH: a probabilistic tool for long-term volcanic hazard assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
BET_VH: a probabilistic tool for long-term volcanic hazard assessment
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00445-010-0357-8
Authors

Warner Marzocchi, Laura Sandri, Jacopo Selva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 70 76%
Engineering 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,445,571
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,770
of 106,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.