↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
162 X users
facebook
34 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2014
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.140433
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moin Khan, Nathan Evaniew, Asheesh Bedi, Olufemi R Ayeni, Mohit Bhandari

Abstract

Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative meniscal tears is a commonly performed procedure, yet the role of conservative treatment for these patients is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of arthroscopic meniscal débridement in patients with knee pain in the setting of mild or no concurrent osteoarthritis of the knee in comparison with nonoperative or sham treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Unknown 255 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Other 25 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Other 56 21%
Unknown 54 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Sports and Recreations 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 63 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 349. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#94,887
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#169
of 9,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#737
of 248,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.