↓ Skip to main content

Favourable effects of fenofibrate on lipids and cardiovascular disease in women with type 2 diabetes: results from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Favourable effects of fenofibrate on lipids and cardiovascular disease in women with type 2 diabetes: results from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study
Published in
Diabetologia, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00125-014-3344-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael C. d’Emden, Alicia J. Jenkins, Liping Li, Diana Zannino, Kristy P. Mann, James D. Best, Bronwyn G. A. Stuckey, Kris Park, Juha Saltevo, Anthony C. Keech, on behalf of the FIELD Study Investigators

Abstract

In the double-blind placebo-controlled Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes trial (n = 9,795), fenofibrate reduced major cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. Sex-related differences in fenofibrate response could be clinically relevant and were pre-specified analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#723,285
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#361
of 5,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,930
of 251,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#7
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.