↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Relevance of Fascial Tissue and Dysfunctions

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Relevance of Fascial Tissue and Dysfunctions
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11916-014-0439-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Klingler, M. Velders, K. Hoppe, M. Pedro, R. Schleip

Abstract

Fascia is composed of collagenous connective tissue surrounding and interpenetrating skeletal muscle, joints, organs, nerves, and vascular beds. Fascial tissue forms a whole-body, continuous three-dimensional viscoelastic matrix of structural support. The classical concept of its mere passive role in force transmission has recently been disproven. Fascial tissue contains contractile elements enabling a modulating role in force generation and also mechanosensory fine-tuning. This hypothesis is supported by in vitro studies demonstrating an autonomous contraction of human lumbar fascia and a pharmacological induction of temporary contraction in rat fascial tissue. The ability of spontaneous regulation of fascial stiffness over a time period ranging from minutes to hours contributes more actively to musculoskeletal dynamics. Imbalance of this regulatory mechanism results in increased or decreased myofascial tonus, or diminished neuromuscular coordination, which are key contributors to the pathomechanisms of several musculoskeletal pathologies and pain syndromes. Here, we summarize anatomical and biomechanical properties of fascial tissue with a special focus on fascial dysfunctions and resulting clinical manifestations. Finally, we discuss current and future potential treatment options that can influence clinical manifestations of pain syndromes associated with fascial tissues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 287 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 18%
Student > Master 51 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Other 18 6%
Researcher 18 6%
Other 65 22%
Unknown 66 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 23%
Sports and Recreations 27 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 2%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 77 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,951,473
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#97
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,545
of 228,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.