↓ Skip to main content

Family member involvement in audiology appointments with older people with hearing impairment

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Audiology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family member involvement in audiology appointments with older people with hearing impairment
Published in
International Journal of Audiology, August 2014
DOI 10.3109/14992027.2014.948218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Ekberg, Carly Meyer, Nerina Scarinci, Caitlin Grenness, Louise Hickson

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate family members' involvement in audiology rehabilitation appointments. Design: Audiology appointments were video-recorded and analysed using quantitative coding and conversation analysis (CA). Study sample: The study sample included 13 audiologists, 17 older adults with hearing impairment, and 17 family members. Results: Initial coding showed that family members participated in 12% of the total talk time during audiology appointments. The CA results demonstrated that family members were not typically invited to join the conversation. However, family members would self-select to speak by: (1) responding to questions from the audiologist which were directed at the client; (2) self-initiating expansions on clients' turns; and (3) self-initiating questions. When family members did participate in the interaction, audiologists typically responded by shifting the conversation back to the client. Conclusion: While family members currently have minimal participation in audiology appointments, they display a strong interest in being involved and sharing their experiences of the client's hearing impairment. The findings suggest support for implementing family-centred care principles in audiology practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Psychology 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,345,501
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Audiology
#445
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,388
of 235,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Audiology
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.