You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of a Family-Centered, Secondhand Smoke Intervention to Reduce Respiratory Illness in Indigenous Infants in Australia and New Zealand: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nicotine & Tobacco Research, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ntr/ntu128 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Walker, Vanessa Johnston, Marewa Glover, Christopher Bullen, Adrian Trenholme, Anne Chang, Peter Morris, Catherine Segan, Ngiare Brown, Debra Fenton, Eyvette Hawthorne, Ron Borland, Varsha Parag, Taina Von Blaramberg, Darren Westphal, David Thomas |
| Abstract |
Secondhand smoke (SHS) is a significant cause of acute respiratory illness (ARI) and 5 times more common in indigenous children. A single-blind randomized trial was undertaken to determine the efficacy of a family centered SHS intervention to reduce ARI in indigenous infants in Australia and New Zealand. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Thailand | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 15% |
| Psychology | 20 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,141,973
of 24,078,959 outputs
Outputs from Nicotine & Tobacco Research
#923
of 3,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,194
of 240,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nicotine & Tobacco Research
#28
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,078,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.