Title |
Estimating Injury and Loss of Life in Floods: A Deterministic Framework
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Hazards, September 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11069-004-4538-7 |
Authors |
Edmund Penning-Rowsell, Peter Floyd, David Ramsbottom, Suresh Surendran |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 133 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 23% |
Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
Researcher | 20 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 15% |
Unknown | 30 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 41 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 19 | 14% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 39 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,811,200
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#441
of 2,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,643
of 69,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them