↓ Skip to main content

Hox Genes

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Hox Genes'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Discovery and Classification of Homeobox Genes in Animal Genomes
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 How to Study Hox Gene Expression and Function in Mammalian Oocytes and Early Embryos
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Genetic Lineage Tracing Analysis of Anterior Hox Expressing Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A genetic strategy to obtain p-gal4 elements in the Drosophila hox genes.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Hox Complex Analysis Through BAC Recombineering
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Genetics of Murine Hox Loci: TAMERE, STRING, and PANTHERE to Engineer Chromosome Variants
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Topological organization of Drosophila hox genes using DNA fluorescent in situ hybridization.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Mining the Cis-Regulatory Elements of Hox Clusters
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Functional Analysis of Hox Genes in Zebrafish
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Transgenesis in Non-model Organisms: The Case of Parhyale.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Tissue Specific RNA Isolation in Drosophila Embryos: A Strategy to Analyze Context Dependent Transcriptome Landscapes Using FACS.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Hox transcriptomics in Drosophila embryos.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Measuring Hox-DNA Binding by Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Analysis.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Chromatin immunoprecipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation with massively parallel sequencing on mouse embryonic tissue.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 ChIP for Hox Proteins from Drosophila Imaginal Discs.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 SELEX-seq: A Method for Characterizing the Complete Repertoire of Binding Site Preferences for Transcription Factor Complexes.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 DamID as an Approach to Studying Long-Distance Chromatin Interactions.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 cgChIP: A Cell Type- and Gene-Specific Method for Chromatin Analysis.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) in Live Drosophila Embryos.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Hox protein interactions: screening and network building.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Rational Drug Repurposing Using sscMap Analysis in a HOX-TALE Model of Leukemia
Attention for Chapter 12: Hox transcriptomics in Drosophila embryos.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hox transcriptomics in Drosophila embryos.
Chapter number 12
Book title
Hox Genes
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1242-1_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1241-4, 978-1-4939-1242-1
Authors

Maria Polychronidou, Ingrid Lohmann

Editors

Yacine Graba, René Rezsohazy

Abstract

Hox proteins are evolutionarily conserved homeodomain containing transcription factors that specify segment identities along the anteroposterior axis of almost all bilaterian animals. They exert their morphogenetic role by transcriptionally regulating a large battery of downstream target genes. Therefore the dissection of transcriptional networks regulated by Hox proteins is an essential step towards a mechanistic understanding of how these transcription factors coordinate multiple developmental and morphogenetic processes. High-throughput techniques allowing whole-transcriptome mRNA expression profiling are powerful tools for the genome-wide identification of Hox downstream target genes in a variety of experimental settings. Here, we describe how to quantitatively identify Hox downstream genes in Drosophila embryos by performing a Hox transcriptome analysis using microarrays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,519
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,940
of 309,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#282
of 576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.