↓ Skip to main content

Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrogeology Journal, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 766)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
7 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1170 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge
Published in
Hydrogeology Journal, January 2002
DOI 10.1007/s10040-001-0176-2
Authors

Bridget R. Scanlon, Richard W. Healy, Peter G. Cook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 1133 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 241 21%
Student > Master 216 18%
Researcher 149 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 71 6%
Other 63 5%
Other 204 17%
Unknown 226 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 358 31%
Environmental Science 224 19%
Engineering 210 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 4%
Computer Science 9 <1%
Other 43 4%
Unknown 280 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,287,121
of 24,384,776 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#16
of 766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,971
of 128,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,384,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.