↓ Skip to main content

Management practices for control of ragwort species

Overview of attention for article published in Phytochemistry Reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 360)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Management practices for control of ragwort species
Published in
Phytochemistry Reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11101-010-9173-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsten A. Leiss

Abstract

The ragwort species common or tansy ragwort (Jacobaea vulgaris, formerly Senecio jacobaea), marsh ragwort (S. aquaticus), Oxford ragwort (S. squalidus) and hoary ragwort (S. erucifolius) are native in Europe, but invaded North America, Australia and New Zealand as weeds. The abundance of ragwort species is increasing in west-and central Europe. Ragwort species contain different groups of secondary plant compounds defending them against generalist herbivores, contributing to their success as weeds. They are mainly known for containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids, which are toxic to grazing cattle and other livestock causing considerable losses to agricultural revenue. Consequently, control of ragwort is obligatory by law in the UK, Ireland and Australia. Commonly used management practices to control ragwort include mechanical removal, grazing, pasture management, biological control and chemical control. In this review the biology of ragwort species is shortly described and the different management practices are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Algeria 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 5 7%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 24 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 27%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Chemistry 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 26 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,359,964
of 25,139,853 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#43
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,754
of 101,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,139,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.