| Title |
A comparison of statistical downscaling and climate change factor methods: impacts on low flows in the River Thames, United Kingdom
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-005-1157-6 |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Diaz-Nieto, Robert L. Wilby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 346 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 97 | 26% |
| Researcher | 81 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 61 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 92 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 84 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 66 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Unknown | 71 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,129,924
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,495
of 5,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,552
of 59,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.