↓ Skip to main content

Can a Novel ICU Data Display Positively Affect Patient Outcomes and Save Lives?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,166)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Can a Novel ICU Data Display Positively Affect Patient Outcomes and Save Lives?
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10916-017-0810-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia Olchanski, Mikhail A. Dziadzko, Ing C. Tiong, Craig E. Daniels, Steve G. Peters, John C. O’Horo, Michelle N. Gong

Abstract

The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of ProCCESs AWARE, Ambient Clinical Analytics, Rochester, MN, a novel acute care electronic medical record interface, on a range of care process and patient health outcome metrics in intensive care units (ICUs). ProCCESs AWARE is a novel acute care EMR interface that contains built-in tools for error prevention, practice surveillance, decision support and reporting. We compared outcomes before and after AWARE implementation using a prospective cohort and a historical control. The study population included all critically ill adult patients (over 18 years old) admitted to four ICUs at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, who stayed in hospital at least 24 h. The pre-AWARE cohort included 983 patients from 2010, and the post-AWARE cohort included 856 patients from 2014. We analyzed patient health outcomes, care process quality, and hospital charges. After adjusting for patient acuity and baseline demographics, overall in-hospital and ICU mortality odds ratios associated with AWARE intervention were 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.70) and 0.38 (0.22, 0.66). ICU length of stay decreased by about 50%, hospital length of stay by 37%, and total charges for hospital stay by 30% in post AWARE cohort (by $43,745 after adjusting for patient acuity and demographics). Better organization of information in the ICU with systems like AWARE has the potential to improve important patient outcomes, such as mortality and length of stay, resulting in reductions in costs of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 20 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Engineering 8 14%
Computer Science 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 407. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#61,069
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#1
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,535
of 318,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.