You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does lethal control of top‐predators release mesopredators? A re‐evaluation of three Australian case studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Management & Restoration, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/emr.12118 |
| Authors |
Benjamin L. Allen, Geoff Lundie‐Jenkins, Neil D. Burrows, Richard M. Engeman, Peter J.S. Fleming, Luke K.‐P. Leung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 29% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#1,824,758
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Management & Restoration
#63
of 382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,818
of 241,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Management & Restoration
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.