↓ Skip to main content

Do young chimpanzees have extraordinary working memory?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
129 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Do young chimpanzees have extraordinary working memory?
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2010
DOI 10.3758/pbr.17.4.599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Cook, Margaret Wilson

Abstract

Do chimpanzees have better spatial working memory than humans? In a previous report, a juvenile chimpanzee outperformed 3 university students on memory for briefly displayed digits in a spatial array (Inoue & Matsuzawa, 2007). The authors described these abilities as extraordinary and likened the chimpanzee's performance to eidetic memory. However, the chimpanzee received extensive practice on a non-time-pressured version of the task; the human subjects received none. Here we report that, after adequate practice, 2 university students substantially outperformed the chimpanzee. There is no evidence for a superior or qualitatively different spatial memory system in chimpanzees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Professor 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 9 11%