You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Instream Methods for Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity in Sandy Streambeds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ground Water, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02475.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew K. Landon, David L. Rus, F. Edwin Harvey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 21% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 42 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 24% |
| Engineering | 23 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,774,920
of 24,838,271 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#36
of 890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,561
of 165,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,838,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.