↓ Skip to main content

Effects of climate-driven temperature changes on the diversity of freshwater macroinvertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
Title
Effects of climate-driven temperature changes on the diversity of freshwater macroinvertebrates
Published in
Oecologia, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00442-006-0542-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Burgmer, H. Hillebrand, M. Pfenninger

Abstract

Increasing temperatures due to climate change were found to influence abundance and timing of species in numerous ways. Whereas many studies have investigated climate-induced effects on the phenology and abundance of single species, less is known about climate-driven shifts in the diversity and composition of entire communities. Analyses of long-term data sets provide the potential to reveal such relationships. We analysed time series of entire communities of macrozoobenthos in lakes and streams in Northern Europe. There were no direct linear effects of temperature and climate indices (North Atlantic Oscillation index) on species composition and diversity, but using multivariate statistics we were able to show that trends in average temperature have already had profound impacts on species composition in lakes. These significant temperature signals on species composition were evident even though we analysed comparatively short time periods of 10-15 years. Future climate shifts may thus induce strong variance in community composition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Germany 8 2%
Canada 4 1%
Brazil 4 1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 344 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 96 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 17%
Student > Master 58 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 5%
Other 68 17%
Unknown 41 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 195 50%
Environmental Science 113 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 53 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,298,985
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#626
of 4,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,354
of 67,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.