You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Women's experiences of more than one termination of pregnancy within two years: a mixed‐methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1471-0528.14940 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C Purcell, J Riddell, A Brown, ST Cameron, C Melville, G Flett, Y Bhushan, L McDaid |
| Abstract |
To examine the experiences of women seeking more than one termination of pregnancy (TOP) within two years. Mixed methods study. Six TOP services across Scotland. Women presenting for TOP between July and December 2015. Descriptive and inferential analysis of quantitative survey data, thematic analysis of qualitative interview data and integrative analysis. In quantitative analysis, multinomial logistic regression was used to compare three groups: previous TOP within two years, beyond two years and no previous TOP. Characteristics and experiences of women seeking TOP. Of 1662 questionnaire respondents, 14.6% (n=242) and 19.8% (n=329) reported previous TOP within and beyond two years, respectively. Previous TOP within two years group was significantly less likely to own their accommodation than no previous TOP group [aOR=0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.62] and previous TOP beyond two years group [aOR=0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.85]; and more likely to report inconsistent [aOR=1.63, 95% CI 1.04-2.57; aOR=1.95, 95% CI 1.16-3.28] and consistent [aOR=2.13, 95% CI 1.39-3.26; aOR=1.71, 95% CI 1.07-2.76] contraceptive use than no previous TOP and previous TOP within two years groups, respectively. Twenty-three women from previous TOP within two years group were interviewed. Qualitative and integrative analyses highlight issues relating to contraceptive challenges, intimate partner violence, life aspirations and socioeconomic disadvantage. Women undergoing more than one TOP within two years may experience particular challenges and vulnerabilities. Service provision should recognise this and move away from stigmatising discourses of 'repeat abortion'. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 53% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#942,825
of 25,487,317 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#293
of 6,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,614
of 338,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#10
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,487,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.