↓ Skip to main content

Use of esmolol after failure of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation to treat patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
8 blogs
twitter
89 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of esmolol after failure of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation to treat patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation
Published in
Resuscitation, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian E. Driver, Guillaume Debaty, David W. Plummer, Stephen W. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 112 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 19%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Unspecified 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#415,947
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#64
of 5,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,588
of 241,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.