↓ Skip to main content

Pentacyclic triterpenes as α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitors: Structure-activity relationships and the synergism with acarbose

Overview of attention for article published in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pentacyclic triterpenes as α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitors: Structure-activity relationships and the synergism with acarbose
Published in
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.09.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo-wei Zhang, Yan Xing, Chen Wen, Xiao-xia Yu, Wen-long Sun, Zhi-long Xiu, Yue-sheng Dong

Abstract

In this paper, the inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase by nine pentacyclic triterpenes was determined. For α-amylase inhibitory activity, the IC50 values of ursolic acid, corosolic acid, and oleanolic acid were 22.6±2.4μM, 31.2±3.4μM, and 94.1±6.7μM, respectively. For α-glucosidase inhibition, the IC50 values of ursolic acid, corosolic acid, betulinic acid, and oleanolic acid were 12.1±1.0μM, 17.2±0.9μM, 14.9±1.9μM, and 35.6±2.6μM, respectively. The combination of corosolic acid and oleanolic acid with acarbose showed synergistic inhibition against α-amylase. The combination of the tested triterpenes with acarbose mainly exhibited additive inhibition against α-glucosidase. Kinetic studies revealed that corosolic acid and oleanolic acid showed non-competitive inhibition and acarbose showed mixed-type inhibition against α-amylase. The results provide valuable implications for the triterpenes (ursolic acid, corosolic acid, and oleanolic acid) alone or in combination with acarbose as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 10 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 17%
Chemistry 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 40 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
#12,194
of 13,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,621
of 323,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
#62
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,780 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.