↓ Skip to main content

Rapid publication-ready MS-Word tables for one-way ANOVA

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Rapid publication-ready MS-Word tables for one-way ANOVA
Published in
SpringerPlus, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-474
Pubmed ID
Authors

Houssein I Assaad, Lan Zhou, Raymond J Carroll, Guoyao Wu

Abstract

Statistical tables are an important component of data analysis and reports in biological sciences. However, the traditional manual processes for computation and presentation of statistically significant results using a letter-based algorithm are tedious and prone to errors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Armenia 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,199,380
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#769
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,395
of 236,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#47
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.