You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Achieving Open Access to Conservation Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12346 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
RICHARD A. FULLER, JASMINE R. LEE, JAMES E. M. WATSON |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 13% |
| Australia | 10 | 8% |
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 66% |
| Scientists | 30 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 187 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 45 | 22% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 65 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#502,985
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#253
of 4,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,592
of 247,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#9
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.