| Title |
Assessment of Dysphagia with the Use of Pulse Oximetry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, May 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/pl00009597 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruce Sherman, Jean M. Nisenboum, Byschelle L. Jesberger, Cynthia A. Morrow, John A. Jesberger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2012.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#365
of 1,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,593
of 36,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.