↓ Skip to main content

Follow-up in colorectal cancer patients: A cost-benefit analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Follow-up in colorectal cancer patients: A cost-benefit analysis
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02305664
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riccardo A. Audisio, Paolo Setti-Carraro, Marco Segala, Deborah Capko, Bruno Andreoni, Giorgio Tiberio

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 82%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,540,093
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,662
of 6,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,327
of 29,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them