↓ Skip to main content

How Good is Endoscopic Ultrasound in Differentiating Various T Stages of Rectal Cancer? Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
How Good is Endoscopic Ultrasound in Differentiating Various T Stages of Rectal Cancer? Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2008
DOI 10.1245/s10434-008-0231-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srinivas R. Puli, Matthew L. Bechtold, Jyotsna B. K. Reddy, Abhishek Choudhary, Mainor R. Antillon, William R. Brugge

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Other 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,697,942
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,100
of 7,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,709
of 180,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.