| Title |
Eating Behavior as a Prognostic Factor for Weight Loss after Gastric Bypass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obesity Surgery, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11695-007-9077-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paulo C. Sallet, José A. Sallet, John B. Dixon, Eliane Collis, Carlos E. Pisani, Andréa Levy, Fábio L. Bonaldi, Taki A. Cordás |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#1,382
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,147
of 89,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.