You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Refining Patient Selection for Reirradiation of Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma in the IMRT Era: A Multi-institution Cohort Study by the MIRI Collaborative
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew C. Ward, Nadeem Riaz, Jimmy J. Caudell, Neal E. Dunlap, Derek Isrow, Sara J. Zakem, Joshua Dault, Musaddiq J. Awan, John A. Vargo, Dwight E. Heron, Kristin A. Higgins, Jonathan J. Beitler, Samuel Marcrom, Drexell H. Boggs, Comron Hassanzadeh, Chandana A. Reddy, James A. Bonner, Min Yao, Mitchell Machtay, Farzan Siddiqui, Andy M. Trotti, Nancy Y. Lee, Shlomo A. Koyfman, Multi-Institution Reirradiation Collaborative |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 58% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 56 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,587,368
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#2,418
of 11,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,213
of 334,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#46
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.