↓ Skip to main content

Impact of an Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum on Resident Use of Electronic Resources: A Randomized Controlled Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Impact of an Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum on Resident Use of Electronic Resources: A Randomized Controlled Study
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11606-008-0766-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarang Kim, Laura R. Willett, David J. Murphy, Kerry O’Rourke, Ranita Sharma, Judy A. Shea

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is widely taught in residency, but evidence for effectiveness of EBM teaching on changing residents' behavior is limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 4%
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 49 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Librarian 5 9%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 42%
Computer Science 7 13%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#21,420,714
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#7,217
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,191
of 88,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#44
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.