| Title |
Long-Term Opioid Contract Use for Chronic Pain Management in Primary Care Practice. A Five Year Experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-006-0084-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaishree Hariharan, Geoffrey C. Lamb, Joan M. Neuner |
| Abstract |
The use of opioid medications to manage chronic pain is complex and challenging, especially in primary care settings. Medication contracts are increasingly being used to monitor patient adherence, but little is known about the long-term outcomes of such contracts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,653,471
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,277
of 8,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,791
of 170,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#9
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.