↓ Skip to main content

Precision annotation of digital samples in NCBI’s gene expression omnibus

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Precision annotation of digital samples in NCBI’s gene expression omnibus
Published in
Scientific Data, September 2017
DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dexter Hadley, James Pan, Osama El-Sayed, Jihad Aljabban, Imad Aljabban, Tej D. Azad, Mohamad O. Hadied, Shuaib Raza, Benjamin Abhishek Rayikanti, Bin Chen, Hyojung Paik, Dvir Aran, Jordan Spatz, Daniel Himmelstein, Maryam Panahiazar, Sanchita Bhattacharya, Marina Sirota, Mark A. Musen, Atul J. Butte

Abstract

The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) contains more than two million digital samples from functional genomics experiments amassed over almost two decades. However, individual sample meta-data remains poorly described by unstructured free text attributes preventing its largescale reanalysis. We introduce the Search Tag Analyze Resource for GEO as a web application (http://STARGEO.org) to curate better annotations of sample phenotypes uniformly across different studies, and to use these sample annotations to define robust genomic signatures of disease pathology by meta-analysis. In this paper, we target a small group of biomedical graduate students to show rapid crowd-curation of precise sample annotations across all phenotypes, and we demonstrate the biological validity of these crowd-curated annotations for breast cancer. STARGEO.org makes GEO data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (i.e., FAIR) to ultimately facilitate knowledge discovery. Our work demonstrates the utility of crowd-curation and interpretation of open 'big data' under FAIR principles as a first step towards realizing an ideal paradigm of precision medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Computer Science 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,857,428
of 24,045,834 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#743
of 2,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,766
of 321,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#25
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,045,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.