↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Five In Vitro Digestion Models To Study the Bioaccessibility of Soil Contaminants

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
649 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Five In Vitro Digestion Models To Study the Bioaccessibility of Soil Contaminants
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, June 2002
DOI 10.1021/es010204v
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnes G. Oomen, Alfons Hack, Mans Minekus, Evelijn Zeijdner, Christa Cornelis, Greet Schoeters, Willy Verstraete, Tom Van de Wiele, Joanna Wragg, Cathy J. M. Rompelberg, Adriënne J. A. M. Sips, Joop H. Van Wijnen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 333 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 23%
Researcher 58 17%
Student > Master 57 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 67 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 77 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 18%
Chemistry 52 15%
Engineering 14 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 3%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 90 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,669,476
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#2,146
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,520
of 48,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.