↓ Skip to main content

Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
54 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
455 Mendeley
Title
Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Panagioti, Gerry Richardson, Nicola Small, Elizabeth Murray, Anne Rogers, Anne Kennedy, Stanton Newman, Peter Bower

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the role of 'self-management' interventions to support the management of long-term conditions in health service settings. Self-management may include patient education, support for decision-making, self-monitoring and psychological and social support. Self-management support has potential to improve the efficiency of health services by reducing other forms of utilisation (such as primary care or hospital use), but a shift to self-management may lead to negative outcomes, such as patients who feel more anxious about their health, are less able to cope, or who receive worse quality of care, all of which may impact on their health and quality of life. We sought to determine which models of self-management support are associated with significant reductions in health services utilisation without compromising outcomes among patients with long-term conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 451 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 18%
Researcher 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 49 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 11%
Other 26 6%
Other 84 18%
Unknown 109 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 84 18%
Psychology 47 10%
Social Sciences 32 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 134 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#944,672
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#234
of 8,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,322
of 247,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#8
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.