↓ Skip to main content

Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3818-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Se Jin Baek, Chang Hee Kim, Min Soo Cho, Sung Uk Bae, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim

Abstract

Total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer can be challenging to perform in the presence of difficult pelvic anatomy. In our previous studies based on open and laparoscopic TME, we found that pelvic MRI-based pelvimetry could well reflect anatomical difficulty of the pelvis and operative time increased in direct proportion to the difficulty. We explored different outcomes of robotic surgery for TME based on classifications of difficult pelvic anatomies to determine whether this method can overcome these challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 18 28%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 63%
Unspecified 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,702,068
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,362
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,551
of 236,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#112
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.