Title |
Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-014-3818-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Se Jin Baek, Chang Hee Kim, Min Soo Cho, Sung Uk Bae, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim |
Abstract |
Total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer can be challenging to perform in the presence of difficult pelvic anatomy. In our previous studies based on open and laparoscopic TME, we found that pelvic MRI-based pelvimetry could well reflect anatomical difficulty of the pelvis and operative time increased in direct proportion to the difficulty. We explored different outcomes of robotic surgery for TME based on classifications of difficult pelvic anatomies to determine whether this method can overcome these challenges. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 28% |
Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 63% |
Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,702,068
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,362
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,551
of 236,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#112
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.