↓ Skip to main content

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome caused by fish ingestion. A case report.

Overview of attention for article published in Revue médicale de Liège, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome caused by fish ingestion. A case report.
Published in
Revue médicale de Liège, January 2014
Pubmed ID
Authors

I Vasilopoulou, G Feketea, M Trigka

Abstract

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) occurs in young infants who present with protracted vomiting and/or diarrhea which generally start 1-4 hours after certain food protein ingestion. Cow's milk and soy protein are most often responsible, but FPIES may be caused by solid foods such as egg white, wheat, rice, nuts, chicken and fish. We report the case of a 12 month-old girl who presented to the Emergency Department with profuse vomiting and diarrhoea having occurred 2 hours after fish ingestion. The patient was dehydrated. Antibiotics and intravenous fluids were administered. Her condition rapidly improved and she was discharged with the diagnosis of gastroenteritis.At the age of 15 months, she was re-admitted to the Emergency Department for the same symptoms, again some 2 hours after fish ingestion. She received the same treatment and rapidly recovered. With the probable diagnosis of fish allergy, the patient was advised to eliminate fish, until further evaluation. At the age of 31 months, a diagnostic oral food challenge was performed and was positive. Skin prick test and serum specific IgE were negative. The diagnosis of FPIES caused by fish protein was established and strict avoidance of fish was recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,787,133
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revue médicale de Liège
#65
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,543
of 319,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revue médicale de Liège
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.