↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic limited Heller myotomy without anti-reflux procedure does not induce significant long-term gastroesophageal reflux

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic limited Heller myotomy without anti-reflux procedure does not induce significant long-term gastroesophageal reflux
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3824-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. C. Zurita Macías Valadez, R. Pescarus, T. Hsieh, L. Wasserman, I. Apriasz, D. Hong, S. Gmora, M. Cadeddu, M. Anvari

Abstract

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication is the gold standard treatment for achalasia. Laparoscopic limited Heller myotomy (LLHM) with no anti-reflux procedure is another possible option.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#13,587,870
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,784
of 6,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,177
of 237,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#47
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.